ATLAS RECORD · UNITED STATES · 50 STATES + FEDERAL MINERALS LAST ENTRY 2026-07-30

Mineral Rights Atlas

A public record of who owns what is under the ground

How to find out who owns the mineral rights

Verified
Jul 30 2026

The short answer

Mineral ownership is found by searching the recorded instruments for one legal description in the county where the land sits, working backwards through the grantor and grantee indices until you reach the patent that first put the land in private hands. The records are public, and in most cases they are the only thing that can answer the question.

Two searches sit alongside that one and are routinely skipped. The federal patent is held in a federal system rather than the county's, and it is where a mineral reservation older than the whole chain of title would appear. And the state oil and gas regulator holds permit, well and production records that name who is operating, which is a different question from who owns and is often the faster way in.

Checked against the sources named below on .

How do I find out who owns the mineral rights on my property?

Start with the county where the land is. Instruments affecting title to real property are recorded with the county recording officer for that county, and the office keeps indices, by the name of the grantor and by the name of the grantee, through which a chain of title is traced name by name backwards from the current owner. What you are looking for is the instrument that severed the minerals from the surface, which will be either a deed conveying the minerals to somebody else or a reservation in a deed of the surface. The chain has to be followed back to the original patent rather than to some convenient recent date, because a severance is effective whenever it happened. Two further searches are separate from that one: the federal patent, held in the Bureau of Land Management's General Land Office records rather than by the county, which is where a reservation to the United States would appear; and the state oil and gas regulator's own well, permit and production records, which identify who is operating rather than who owns. The searches are public. What differs between states is what the record puts you on notice of, and what differs between counties is how the index is actually exposed, which this record has not read for any county.

Checked against the sources named below on .

The search, and what each part of it is for

There are three record systems in play and they answer three different questions. Confusing them is the most common way this search goes wrong.

  • The county records answer who owns the estate. Every instrument affecting title to the tract is recorded there, and the severance, if there is one, is an instrument like any other.
  • The federal patent records answer whether the minerals were ever conveyed into private ownership at all. A reservation there predates the entire county chain and will never appear in it.
  • The state regulator's records answer who is operating, under what permit, and what has been produced. That is not ownership, but an operator has to know who the mineral owners are in order to pay them, so production and permit records are often how a search gets its bearings.

What the record has been read on, state by state

The rules below are what this record holds on running a search in each state that has been read. They are deliberately not parallel to one another. One state has been read on the indices its clerks must keep, one on how far outside the chain of title a searcher is bound to look, one on what its regulator may compel an operator to produce, and more than one on what its recording statute does with a United States patent, which is the instrument a county chain of title starts from. The unevenness is the reading, and it is easier to work with when it is visible than when it is smoothed into a uniform-looking summary.

Generated from the record. A state appears here for what has actually been read about searching in it, so the rows are not parallel to each other and are not meant to be: this is a map of the reading, not a claim that each state's search works the same way.
StateWhat has been read about searching thereChecked
ColoradoA chain of title is searched through the grantor and grantee indicesJuly 29, 2026
MichiganThe supervisor of wells can require logs, samples and proof of who owns a leaseJuly 30, 2026
MontanaRecording gives constructive notice from the moment of filingJuly 30, 2026
MontanaA United States patent can be recorded, and a certified copy stands in for a lost oneJuly 30, 2026
New MexicoThe recording statute names United States patents in termsJuly 30, 2026
North DakotaKnowing about a document outside the chain of title is not notice of itJuly 30, 2026
OhioA gas royalty holder can demand the volume and the priceJuly 30, 2026
OklahomaRecording gives constructive notice from the moment of filingJuly 30, 2026
TexasAn instrument must be recorded in the county where the land isJuly 30, 2026

Colorado

records

A chain of title is searched through the grantor and grantee indices

verified

C.R.S. § 30-10-408

Every Colorado county clerk and recorder keeps a grantor index and a grantee index, and a chain of title is traced by working name by name back through them.

Every county clerk and recorder shall keep a grantor index and a grantee index in the clerk and recorder's office.
read from Public.Law, Colorado Revised Statutes, current through Fall 2025

Checked July 29, 2026. Section read at colorado.public.law, current through Fall 2025. It sets out seven columns for each index: time of reception, names of grantors, names of grantees, type of document, volume and page where recorded, remarks, and description of tract. Subsection (1)(b) requires the clerk and recorder to make correct entries in the grantor index of every document filed or recorded concerning or affecting real estate, entering the names of the grantors in alphabetical order, and subsection (2) does the same for the grantee index. This establishes the index a title search actually runs on. It does not establish how any individual county exposes that index online, which differs county by county and is not published here.

Michigan

records

The supervisor of wells can require logs, samples and proof of who owns a lease

verified

MCL 324.61506(n)

Michigan's supervisor of wells is empowered to require reports and maps showing the location of every well, the keeping and filing of logs, well samples and drilling, testing and operating records, and to require identification of the ownership of oil and gas producing leases, properties and wells.

To require identification of the ownership of oil and gas producing leases, properties, and wells.

Checked July 30, 2026. Read at the supervisor of wells powers section of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act. Recorded under records because that is what it produces: the two powers together are why Michigan holds a body of well logs, samples, operating records and lease ownership information at all. The same subsection that requires logs and samples provides that well data and samples furnished to the supervisor may be held confidential on the written request of the well owner, so not everything filed is public, and the terms of that confidentiality were not read. Nor was the division's public search interface located during this pass, which is named in this page's gaps.

Montana

records

Recording gives constructive notice from the moment of filing

verified

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-21-302

Every Montana conveyance of real property that is acknowledged or proved, certified and recorded as the law prescribes is constructive notice of its contents to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees from the time it is filed with the county clerk. A certified copy of a recorded conveyance may be recorded in any other county with the same force as the original.

Every conveyance of real property acknowledged or proved and certified and recorded as prescribed by law, from the time it is filed with the county clerk for record, is constructive notice of the contents thereof to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees.

Checked July 30, 2026. Read at section 70-21-302. The recording officer named in the current text is the county clerk, which is the office a Montana searcher deals with, and the section is the companion to the priority rule: it is what makes a recorded instrument bind someone who never saw it. Note the reach of the notice as the section states it, to subsequent purchasers and mortgagees, which is narrower on its face than Oklahoma's equivalent, which names purchasers, mortgagees, encumbrancers and creditors. Subsection (2) is the practical provision for land straddling a county line or for a chain that moved between counties: a certified copy of a recorded conveyance may itself be recorded in another county and has the same force there as the original would.

records

A United States patent can be recorded, and a certified copy stands in for a lost one

verified

Mont. Code Ann. § 70-21-207

Letters patent from the United States or from Montana, and other documents issued under their authority that evidence or affect title to land, may be recorded in Montana without acknowledgment or further proof. Where the patent has been lost or is beyond the control of a party claiming title under it, a certified transcript of the issuing government's own copy may be recorded instead, and that record has prima facie the same force as the original until the original is recorded.

Letters patent from the United States or from the state of Montana or other documents and instruments or duly certified copies thereof issued by or pursuant to the authority of the United States or the state of Montana which evidence title to land or affect the title thereof, executed and authenticated pursuant to existing law, may be recorded without acknowledgment or further proof

Checked July 30, 2026. Read at section 70-21-207, whose history line runs back to the Civil Code of 1895 and to California Civil Code section 1160. This is the second route this record has found from a state page into the federal reservation record, and it is a different route from New Mexico's. New Mexico's recording statute names United States patents among the instruments that shall be recorded. Montana's instead makes the patent easy to get onto the record and supplies a substitute when the original is gone, which is the practical problem for a nineteenth century patent: a certified transcript of the issuing government's own copy is recordable in lieu of it. Read alongside the federal record on this site, that matters because the patent is the instrument which decides whether the minerals under a tract were ever conveyed into private hands at all. What this record does not establish is how much Montana land carries a federal mineral reservation, in acres or in proportion, and no figure for it is published here. Section 82-2-113 separately makes a United States patent for a mining claim conclusive evidence that Montana's location and record requirements were met; that provision concerns mining claims rather than oil and gas and was read but is not relied on above.

New Mexico

records

The recording statute names United States patents in terms

verified

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 14-9-1

New Mexico requires all deeds, mortgages, leases with an initial plus option term over five years or memoranda of them, leasehold mortgages, United States patents and other writings affecting title to real estate to be recorded with the county clerk of each county where the land sits.

All deeds, mortgages, leases of an initial term plus option terms in excess of five years, or memoranda of the material terms of such leases, assignments or amendments to such leases, leasehold mortgages, United States patents and other writings affecting the title to real estate shall be recorded in the office of the county clerk of the county or counties in which the real estate affected thereby is situated.
read from FindLaw Codes, current as of January 1, 2024

Checked July 30, 2026. Read from an allowlisted mirror stating it is current as of January 1, 2024, because the official copy would not extract. The phrase worth stopping on is United States patents, which no other recording statute on this record names. Where land was patented out of federal ownership, that patent is the instrument which decides whether the minerals under a tract were ever conveyed into private hands at all, and it is the document the federal record on this site says a county search cannot substitute for. The section also allows shorter leases and memoranda of their material terms to be recorded, and defines what a memorandum of material terms must contain.

North Dakota

records

Knowing about a document outside the chain of title is not notice of it

verified

N.D.C.C. § 47-19-46

An unrecorded North Dakota instrument is valid between the parties to it and against those who have notice of it, but knowledge of the record of an instrument outside the chain of title does not amount to that notice. A conveyance recorded before the deed that vested record title in its grantor stops being out of the chain once that later deed is recorded.

An unrecorded instrument is valid as between the parties thereto and those who have notice thereof. Knowledge of the record of an instrument out of the chain of title does not constitute such notice

Checked July 30, 2026. Read at section 47-19-46. This is the rule that tells a title searcher how far the search actually has to go, and it is the practical companion to the priority rule: a document that sits outside the chain of title does not bind a purchaser merely because it is on record somewhere. The proviso at the end of the section is the exception that matters, and it is recorded here because it is easy to miss: a mortgage, deed or other conveyance recorded before the instrument that vested record title in the mortgagor or grantor is no longer treated as out of the chain of title once that instrument is itself recorded.

Ohio

records

A gas royalty holder can demand the volume and the price

verified

R.C. 1509.30

The holder of a royalty interest in an Ohio natural gas well may require the well owner to report the volume of gas the holder was paid for, the price per thousand cubic feet paid to the holder, and the volume shown to have passed through the owner's meter for the field. The owner must keep those records for two years and answer a request within fifteen days or by the end of the current payment period, whichever is later.

The holder of a royalty interest in any natural gas well may request the owner to report to him, no more frequently than the payment period in his contract with the owner:

Checked July 30, 2026. Read at section 1509.30, effective July 14, 1972 under Senate Bill 387 of the 109th General Assembly. This is the first rule on this record giving a royalty owner a direct statutory right to the numbers behind their own cheque, and it is recorded under records because that is what it produces. Two limits are in the text: the request may be made no more frequently than the payment period in the holder's contract, and the reportable back window is the most recent period plus any earlier periods within two years of production for which no report has been given. Where the holder's well is metered the owner must also report the volume through that meter, and volumes are reported on the basis of a standard cubic foot. The section speaks only of natural gas wells; nothing here establishes an equivalent right for oil.

Oklahoma

records

Recording gives constructive notice from the moment of filing

verified

16 O.S. § 16

Every conveyance of Oklahoma real property that is acknowledged or approved, certified and recorded as the law prescribes is constructive notice of its contents to subsequent purchasers, mortgagees, encumbrancers and creditors from the time it is filed.

Every conveyance of real property acknowledged or approved, certified and recorded as prescribed by law from the time it is filed with the register of deeds for record is constructive notice of the contents thereof to subsequent purchasers, mortgagees, encumbrancers or creditors.

Checked July 30, 2026. Read in the Legislature's complete-title PDF for Title 16. The section dates from the Revised Laws of 1910 and still refers to the register of deeds; the recording officer a reader deals with today is the county clerk, which is the office Section 75 of the same title directs marketable title notices of claim to and the office the affidavit sections operate through. This record has not read the statute that renamed or reassigned the office, so the change of name is noted rather than sourced.

Texas

records

An instrument must be recorded in the county where the land is

verified

Tex. Prop. Code § 11.001(a)

To be effectively recorded in Texas an instrument relating to real property must be eligible for recording and must be recorded in the county in which a part of the property is located, and the county clerk must record instruments affecting the same property in the order they are filed and keep the indexes required by law.

To be effectively recorded, an instrument relating to real property must be eligible for recording and must be recorded in the county in which a part of the property is located.

Checked July 30, 2026. Chapter 11 read on the Texas Legislative Council's own statutes site, which states the statutes are current through the 89th 2nd Called Legislative Session, 2025. Section 11.004 sets the recorder's duties: a county clerk shall correctly record within a reasonable time any instrument authorised or required to be recorded, shall record instruments relating to the same property in the order the instruments are filed, and shall provide and keep the indexes required by law. Section 11.008 expressly includes a mineral lease in its definition of an instrument recorded by a county clerk relating to real property, and provides that all such instruments are subject to inspection by the public. Note the site is a JavaScript application: a plain fetch of the chapter URL returns the site shell rather than the chapter, and this was read in a browser.

Two of those repay reading closely even if you have no interest in the state they come from, because they are the two questions every searcher eventually hits. What index does the search actually run through, and how far outside the direct chain of title does it have to reach. The second one has a real answer on this record: knowledge of a document recorded outside the chain of title does not amount to notice of it, with a proviso for an instrument recorded before the deed that vested record title in its grantor, which stops being out of the chain once that later deed is itself recorded.

The federal search, which the county cannot do for you

This is the step that is skipped most often and the one most likely to change the answer. Where the land was patented out of federal ownership, the patent is the instrument that decided whether the minerals were ever in private hands, and it is a federal record.

records

Federal patents are searched in the General Land Office records

verified

Bureau of Land Management, General Land Office Records

The Bureau of Land Management publishes federal land conveyance records for the public land states, with images of more than five million federal land title records issued from 1788 to the present, which is where a patent carrying a mineral reservation is found.

We provide live access to Federal land conveyance records for the Public Land States, including image access to more than five million Federal land title records issued between 1788 and the present.

Checked July 29, 2026. Quoted from the General Land Office Records site's own description, read in a browser on 2026-07-29 because the site is a JavaScript application that returns no readable content to a plain fetch. This is the search that answers whether the original patent reserved the minerals to the United States, which no county grantor and grantee index will tell you. The site also offers a map search and document type browsing. NOT READ HERE: whether coverage is complete for any particular state or county, and how a reservation is identified on the face of a specific patent image.

What such a patent reserved is on the federal page, together with what the reservation carries with it. The companion page to this one covers why a clean county search is not an answer on its own.

What the state regulator holds

Every state on this record has a conservation agency, and each publishes a different set of records. This is generated from each state's own file, with the date the agency's publications were last checked, because these systems get renamed and reorganised more often than statutes do.

Colorado

Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC), checked July 29, 2026. What it publishes:

  • COGIS, the Colorado Oil and Gas Information System, with inquiries by facility, sample site, production, levy, inspection and incident, operator name and address and financial assurance, local government, reclamation inspection status by operator, and chemical disclosure
  • An imaged document search covering well files
  • Production by county
  • A permit search
  • An orders search, plus hearings and enforcement records
  • Rules, policies, forms and operator guidance
  • An online interactive GIS map
  • A public complaints search
  • Area reports, staff reports and technical reports

Michigan

Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • Permits, through the department's permitting pages
  • Open data and map viewers, including Dataminer and the department's maps and apps
  • Well records the supervisor of wells is empowered to require: reports and maps showing well locations, logs, well samples, and drilling, testing and operating records
  • Identification of the ownership of oil and gas producing leases, properties and wells

Montana

Montana Board of Oil and Gas Conservation (BOGC), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • Online data, a GIS application and downloadable GIS data
  • A section addressed to mineral and surface owners
  • A weekly activity letter, and annual reviews
  • Hearing information, including the schedule of the six public hearings held each year
  • Rules, statutes and policies, and forms
  • Material for current or new operators
  • Well and production data, which the board collects and houses as part of its regulatory activities
  • Drilling permits, well spacing units and pooling orders within spacing units
  • Records of enhanced recovery project approvals, site inspections and complaint investigations
  • Orphaned well plugging and reclamation material, including federal infrastructure funding pages

New Mexico

New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Oil Conservation Division (OCD), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • OCD permitting, and applications, permits and notifications
  • OCD forms and operator guidance
  • OCD data
  • OCD imaging
  • An OCD geospatial hub
  • OCD rules, and Oil Conservation Commission materials
  • Oil Conservation Division hearings, and public meetings and comments
  • OCD announcements and notifications
  • Oil and gas public resources

North Dakota

North Dakota Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas Division (NDIC), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • A well search, and a confidential well list
  • Daily activity reports and a list of active drilling rigs
  • Hearing dockets for Commission proceedings
  • General statistics, and publications
  • A GIS map server
  • Seismic information and a gathering pipelines section
  • A section addressed to surface and mineral owners
  • Rules and regulations, policies and guidance, and forms
  • Electronic filing through NorthSTAR, the statewide tracking and reporting system
  • Spill and incident reporting

Ohio

Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management (ODNR), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • Oil and gas permit information, including the permit application process and the stratigraphic test well permit
  • Owner registration, the first step in the regulatory process for a well owner
  • Change of owner and well transfer procedures
  • Bonding and insurance requirements for oil and gas wells
  • Brine transporter registration and authorization
  • Rules and regulations by division, covering oil well drilling, production pipelines, safety, solution mining and oil and gas waste facilities
  • Orphan well program public notices

Oklahoma

Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • Docket results and electronic case filing for Commission proceedings
  • A searchable imaged documents archive
  • A searchable MOEA database
  • Current rules, proposed rules and proposed emergency rules
  • Public meeting notices, agendas and meeting archives
  • Agency reports and open records requests
  • Complaints intake for crude oil and natural gas
  • The Oklahoma Oil and Gas Conservation Division, and a public oil and gas information system at ogims.public.occ.ok.gov

Texas

Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), checked July 30, 2026. What it publishes:

  • Statewide production data for oil and gas, including a production data query and 24 months of production history
  • A drilling permit master file, pending drilling permits with latitudes and longitudes, and horizontal drilling permits
  • Imaged drilling permit (W1) files
  • Digital map data covering base map, wells, surveys and pipeline layers, with GIS documentation
  • Oil and gas annual report field tables and statewide field data
  • Operator, lease and well allowable information
  • Accident reporting and complaints intake
  • Hearings and legal materials

Worth saying plainly what these are and are not. A regulator's records are about wells and operations. They will tell you that a well exists, who was permitted to drill it and what it has produced, and that is frequently the fastest way to find out whether anybody thinks the minerals under your ground are worth having. What they are not is a register of mineral ownership. Nothing on this record establishes that any state maintains such a register, and the county records remain the answer to who owns.

One limit is worth carrying over from Michigan's rule above, because the question it raises applies well beyond Michigan: well data and samples furnished to that state's supervisor may be held confidential at the owner's written request, so not everything an operator files is necessarily public. The terms of that confidentiality have not been read for this record, and no other state's have been looked at either.

When the owner is dead, and when the money is looking for them

Two situations come up constantly in this search and one state on this record has been read on both of them. Neither is a general rule for anywhere else, and both are the kind of provision worth knowing exists so you can ask whether your state has an equivalent.

severance

An inherited severed interest can be cleared by a recorded affidavit of heirship

verified

16 O.S. § 67(A)

Where the owner of a severed mineral interest in Oklahoma real estate has died, a person claiming that interest through a recorded affidavit of death and heirship acquires marketable title to it against adverse claimants, provided the statutory conditions are met, and so does a purchaser for value buying from such a claimant.

After the date of death of a person who was an owner of a severed mineral interest in real estate, a person who claims such interest, immediately or remotely, through an affidavit of death and heirship recorded pursuant to Sections 82 and 83 of this title, shall acquire a valid and marketable title to such interest as against any person claiming adversely to such recorded affidavit on the conditions set forth in subsection C of this section.

Checked July 30, 2026. Read in the same complete-title PDF. Subsection C sets the conditions and they are strict: the affidavit or recital must state that the decedent died without a will, or that a will was never probated in Oklahoma with a copy attached, or that the will was probated but the severed mineral interest was omitted from the final decree with the will and decree attached; it must list the heirs and their relationship to the decedent; and the maker must state that they are related to the decedent or otherwise have personal knowledge of the facts. The section is worth having because inherited severed minerals are the single most common way an Oklahoma mineral interest ends up with a clouded record, and this is the statutory route to clearing it. The remaining conditions in subsection C beyond those listed here were not read in full.

That is the answer to a very common dead end, where the record owner died decades ago and the interest has never been formally moved to the people who inherited it. The record does not update itself when somebody dies.

unclaimed

Royalty money for an owner who cannot be found goes to a state fund

verified

52 O.S. § 552(B)

Where royalties, bonus or other monies are payable under an Oklahoma pooling order and the people entitled to them are unknown or cannot be located after due diligence, the Corporation Commission requires the holder to put the money in an escrow account for the rightful recipient, and anyone proving identity and ownership must be paid promptly from it.

The escrow account shall be for the benefit of the rightful recipient of the monies. Any person showing to the holder sufficient proof of identity and proof of ownership of the property shall be promptly paid the sum accumulated for his benefit in the escrow account.

Checked July 30, 2026. Read in the Legislature's complete-title PDF for Title 52. This is the first unclaimed-proceeds rule on this record and it is a real answer to the question a mineral owner asks as "where is my missing royalty money". Section 552 requires the escrow account and requires reports within a year of the pooling order giving the owner's name and last known address, the legal description of the interest, the account details and the date of the order. Section 554 then routes the money onward: the Commission transmits funds to the State Treasurer by the close of the second working day after receipt, the Treasurer holds them in trust in the Mineral Owner's Fund, the names go into the Treasurer's regular annual process for locating owners of unclaimed property, and claims are made to the Treasurer, who pays a proven owner or their heirs, devisees or assigns. The Commission retains ten percent of transferred funds to cover administration. The Corporation Commission separately publishes a searchable MOEA database; this record has not read anything stating what that abbreviation expands to or how that database relates to these sections, so the two are recorded separately rather than as one thing.

The reason that one belongs on a page about finding ownership is that it runs in the opposite direction. If royalty money has been accruing to an owner nobody could locate, the existence of the fund is itself evidence that somebody, at some point, believed that person owned an interest. Other states on this record name their own unclaimed-proceeds regimes in their gaps as things that have not been read, which is visible in the gaps block on each state page.

What this page does not tell you

  • How your county's search actually works. Not the fees, not the opening hours, not how far back the images go, not whether any of it is online. Those differ county by county, no county's own system has been read for this record, and Colorado's page names that gap in terms. The statutes here establish the office and the index; they do not describe the counter.
  • Anything about the other 42 states. Eight states have been read and each is named above with its own source and date.
  • How long a search should take or what it should cost. No source has been read that would support a figure, and every number in circulation for this is somebody's marketing.
  • Whether you should do it yourself. This site publishes the law and the place to look. What a title examiner, an abstractor or a landman does, how they are licensed in any state, and what they charge, are all outside what has been read here.

Whether the answer is yours is the companion page: what a severance is, what an unrecorded instrument does to a later buyer in each state, and the statutes that can move a severed interest to the surface owner. The state record shows which states have been read.

Questions people actually ask

How do I find out who owns the mineral rights on my property?

Search the recorded instruments for your legal description in the county where the land sits, working backwards through the grantor and grantee indices from the present owner to the original patent. What you are looking for is a severance: a deed conveying the minerals away, or a reservation in a deed of the surface. If you find one, the chain continues from there in the name of whoever took the minerals, and that chain is what identifies the present owner. Two searches sit alongside it: the federal patent, held in the Bureau of Land Management's General Land Office records, and the state oil and gas regulator's well and production records, which identify operators rather than owners.

Are mineral rights public record?

Yes. The instruments that create and convey them are recorded in the county where the land is located, and the whole point of a recording system is that it is open: recording a conveyance is what gives constructive notice of its contents to later purchasers, mortgagees and creditors, which only works if anyone can look. Texas has been read on the point directly and its statute provides that instruments relating to real property recorded by a county clerk are subject to inspection by the public. What is public is the record of the instruments. That is a different thing from a public register of mineral ownership, and nothing on this record establishes that any state maintains one of those, which is why the search runs through a chain of deeds rather than through a lookup.

How far back does a mineral title search have to go?

To the patent, in principle, because a severance is effective whenever it was made and there is no point in the chain before which severances stop mattering. In practice how far a searcher is obliged to look is a legal question with a real answer, and North Dakota has been read on the sharpest part of it: knowledge of the record of an instrument that sits outside the chain of title does not constitute notice of it, so a document recorded somewhere in the county's books but not in your tract's chain does not bind a purchaser merely by existing. The proviso matters too. An instrument recorded before the deed that vested record title in its grantor stops being out of the chain once that later deed is recorded.

Can I look up mineral rights ownership online for free?

Partly, and how much depends entirely on your county, which is something this record has not read for any county in any state. The statutes establish that the office exists and that it keeps indices; they say nothing about what it puts on the internet. What is reliably available online without charge is the federal side, where the General Land Office records provide live access to federal land conveyance records for the public land states, with images of more than five million title records issued from 1788 onward, and the state regulators' own systems, each of which is listed on this page with what it publishes. For the county chain of title itself, assume you may have to deal with the office directly.

What is a grantor grantee index?

It is the pair of indices a county recording office keeps, one listing instruments by the name of the party conveying and one by the name of the party receiving, and it is the mechanism a chain of title is actually traced through. Colorado has been read on it: every county clerk and recorder must keep a grantor index and a grantee index, with entries made in alphabetical order by name, recording for each document the time of reception, the parties, the type of document, where it is recorded, and the description of the tract. You work backwards through the grantee index to find who conveyed to your seller, then who conveyed to them, and so on. This record establishes the index the search runs on; it does not establish how any individual county exposes it.

How do I find the mineral owner if they died a long time ago?

The record does not update itself on a death, so the last recorded owner may have died decades ago and the interest may never have been formally moved to the heirs. Oklahoma has been read on one route through this. Where the owner of a severed mineral interest has died, a person claiming that interest through a recorded affidavit of death and heirship acquires marketable title to it as against anyone claiming adversely, and so does a purchaser for value buying from that claimant, provided strict statutory conditions are met about what the affidavit states and who made it. That is the statute this record read; the sections governing how such an affidavit is recorded in the first place were not read, and neither was anything on any other state, so whether yours has an equivalent is a reading that has not been done here. The other direction is worth checking too, because where royalty money has accrued to an owner nobody could find, some states hold it in a fund and the fund's records are themselves a lead.

Sources read

  1. Public.Law, Colorado Revised Statutes C.R.S. § 30-10-408 read July 29, 2026
  2. Michigan Compiled Laws, Michigan Legislature MCL 324.61506(n) read July 30, 2026
  3. Montana Code Annotated, Montana Legislative Services Mont. Code Ann. § 70-21-302 read July 30, 2026
  4. Montana Code Annotated, Montana Legislative Services Mont. Code Ann. § 70-21-207 read July 30, 2026
  5. FindLaw Codes N.M. Stat. Ann. § 14-9-1 read July 30, 2026
  6. North Dakota Century Code, North Dakota Legislative Branch N.D.C.C. § 47-19-46 read July 30, 2026
  7. Ohio Revised Code, Ohio Legislative Service Commission R.C. 1509.30 read July 30, 2026
  8. Oklahoma Statutes, Oklahoma State Legislature 16 O.S. § 16 read July 30, 2026
  9. Texas Constitution and Statutes, Texas Legislative Council Tex. Prop. Code § 11.001(a) read July 30, 2026
  10. Oklahoma Statutes, Oklahoma State Legislature 52 O.S. § 552(B) read July 30, 2026
  11. Bureau of Land Management, General Land Office Records read July 29, 2026
  12. Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission read July 29, 2026
  13. Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy read July 30, 2026
  14. Montana Board of Oil and Gas Conservation, Department of Natural Resources and Conservation read July 30, 2026
  15. New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department read July 30, 2026
  16. North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas Division read July 30, 2026
  17. Ohio Department of Natural Resources read July 30, 2026
  18. Oklahoma Corporation Commission read July 30, 2026
  19. Railroad Commission of Texas read July 30, 2026

The Monthly Abstract

One briefing a month on what changed in mineral law and mineral markets, plus an instant alert when your state's rules move. Nothing else, ever.

Subscribe