Georgia mineral rights
Checked August 4, 2026 Updated August 4, 2026 8 sources read
Aug 4 2026
The short answer
Georgia has no dormant mineral act, and a Georgia mineral interest can still be lost for inactivity on the shortest clock on this record. The route is different from every state that has an actual dormancy statute. Under O.C.G.A. 44-5-168 the surface owner may gain title to severed minerals by adverse possession once the mineral owner has neither worked nor attempted to work them nor paid any taxes due on them, and the period is seven years, running both since the conveyance and immediately before the petition.
Nothing happens automatically. The surface owner has to file a petition in the superior court for the county where the land lies, plead the deed and the seven years, and serve the mineral owner as in an in rem proceeding, including by publication. Two things in subsection (f) switch the statute off completely: a lease for a specific number of years, and a written lease to a licensed mining operator. And paying the ad valorem taxes is enough on its own, because the test is stated in the conjunctive.
Checked against the sources named below on .
Can I lose my Georgia mineral rights by not using them?
Yes, but only if somebody takes you to court, and only if you have done none of three things. O.C.G.A. 44-5-168 is not a dormant mineral act and it does not work like one. It is written as adverse possession, and the person who benefits is the owner of the surface in fee simple, either where the minerals were conveyed away or where a grantor sold the surface and reserved the minerals. The condition is that the mineral owner "have neither worked nor attempted to work the mineral rights nor paid any taxes due on them" for seven years, and the seven years has to run twice over: seven years since the date of the conveyance, and seven years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. Because that test is conjunctive, any one of the three defeats it. Working the minerals defeats it. So does an attempt to work them that never became production. So does simply paying the ad valorem taxes, with no activity on the ground at all. Then the procedure, which is the real protection: the surface owner files a petition in the nature of declaratory judgment in the superior court for the county where the land is located, naming the grantor and the last known addresses of the heirs or assigns and anybody else known to hold an interest, and pleading the conveyance and the seven years. Service is perfected as on defendants in an in rem proceeding, which expressly includes service by publication, and anybody named or holding an interest may intervene. Only on a finding for the plaintiff does the court issue a judgment and decree declaring the mineral rights lost. Nothing vests on its own, which is the opposite of South Dakota and North Dakota, where the interest passes with no court involved at all. And two situations are outside the section entirely, under subsection (f): it does not apply to a lease for a specific number of years, and it does not apply to an owner of mineral rights who has leased them in writing to a licensed mining operator as defined in the surface mining part of Title 12. A Georgia mineral owner with a written lease to a licensed operator is outside this statute whether or not anybody ever mines. The limit on all of it is stated on this page in full: the text read here is current to March 2024, Georgia's official portal shows a version of this section effective 1 July 2026, and what that amendment changed could not be read.
Checked against the sources named below on .
Whether an interest can be lost by not using it
Seven years of neither working the minerals nor paying their taxes, and the surface owner can petition a court to take them
partialO.C.G.A. § 44-5-168read from FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 44-5-168, current as of March 28, 2024
Georgia has no dormant mineral act and no marketable record title act reaching minerals, but a Georgia mineral interest can still be lost for inactivity, and the period is the shortest on this record. Where minerals were conveyed away, or reserved by a grantor who sold the surface in fee simple, O.C.G.A. 44-5-168 lets the surface owner GAIN TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION if the mineral owner has neither worked nor attempted to work the minerals nor paid any taxes due on them. The period is seven years, and it has to run twice over: seven years since the date of the conveyance, and seven years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. Nothing vests on its own. The surface owner must file a petition in the nature of declaratory judgment in the superior court for the county where the land is located, naming the grantor and the last known addresses of the heirs or assigns and anybody else known to have an interest, and pleading the deed and the seven years. Service is perfected as in an in rem proceeding, which expressly includes service by publication, and any person named or holding an interest may intervene. Only on a finding for the plaintiff does the court issue a decree that the mineral rights have been lost. Two exclusions in subsection (f) switch the section off entirely, and they are the practical answer for a mineral owner who does nothing else: it does not apply to a lease for a specific number of years, and it does not apply to an owner of mineral rights who has leased them in writing to a licensed mining operator.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read in full on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror at codes.findlaw.com, the whole of 44-5-168 from subsection (a) through subsection (f), not an index or a summary. The route to it is worth recording because it defeated this record for three days: Georgia publishes the O.C.G.A. through a LexisNexis public access portal that renders free of charge but has no per-section address to cite, and the mirror is what supplies an address a reader can open. A caution on where this section sits. The word MINERAL appears in none of the sixteen chapter names of Title 44, Property, and this section is nonetheless inside Chapter 5, Acquisition and Loss of Property, in the prescription article. A chapter list would have missed it, which is the same trap Connecticut set. Nineteen occurrences of MINERAL inside this one section against zero in the chapter names above it.
Paying the taxes is enough on its own, and a written lease to a licensed mining operator removes the section entirely
partialO.C.G.A. § 44-5-168(a) and (f)read from FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 44-5-168, current as of March 28, 2024
Three separate things defeat a Georgia adverse possession claim against minerals, and a mineral owner only needs one of them. The test in O.C.G.A. 44-5-168(a) is stated in the conjunctive: the surface owner must show the mineral owner has neither worked the minerals, NOR attempted to work them, NOR paid any taxes due on them. Paying the ad valorem taxes alone therefore defeats the claim, without any work on the ground at all, and so does an attempt to work that never became production. Subsection (f) then removes two situations from the section altogether rather than merely defeating a claim within it: it does not apply to a lease for a specific number of years, and it does not apply to an owner of mineral rights who has leased the mineral rights in writing to a licensed mining operator as defined in the surface mining part of Title 12. That second exclusion is the one worth knowing. A Georgia mineral owner who has signed a written lease with a licensed operator is outside the statute whether or not anybody ever mines, whether or not the taxes are paid, and for as long as the lease stands.
Checked August 4, 2026. Established on 2026-08-04 by reading subsections (a) and (f) of 44-5-168 directly rather than by inference from the catchline. The conjunctive reading is on the face of the text, which says the owner must have neither worked nor attempted to work nor paid any taxes, so any one of the three defeats the petition.
The page on whether mineral rights expire sets every state on this record beside each other, including the ones where a filing today would still save an interest.
What counts as a mineral here, and who the statute treats as the owner
Georgia settles both questions functionally rather than with a list, and the definitions are worth reading before anything else on this page because they decide the reach of everything below.
The statute defines the owner by the right to drill, and a mineral by whether it has commercial value
verifiedO.C.G.A. § 12-4-42(11) and (8)
Georgia's oil and gas statute does not define who owns minerals by reference to a deed. O.C.G.A. 12-4-42 defines OWNER as the person who has the right to drill into and produce from any pool and to appropriate the production, either for himself or herself and another, or himself or herself and others. That is a functional test, identical in shape to the one New Mexico uses, and its practical effect is the same: for everything the regulator does, the person who counts is whoever holds the drilling right at that moment, whether that is a fee mineral owner or a lessee. The definition of MINERAL in the same section is unusually wide. It means any naturally occurring substance found in the earth which has commercial value, expressly including oil and gas as separately defined, and expressly excluding fresh water. Commercial value is the test, so the category moves with the market rather than with a list, and Georgia's kaolin, granite, marble and aggregate all fall inside it even though the severance tax at 12-4-54 reaches only oil and gas.
“Owner” means the person who has the right to drill into and produce from any pool and to appropriate the production either for himself or herself and another, or himself or herself and others.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the definitions section of the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act, O.C.G.A. 12-4-42, on the verbatim mirror. Ten occurrences of MINERAL inside this one section. The definition of mineral quoted in the summary reads in full: any naturally occurring substance found in the earth which has commercial value, including oil and gas as defined in the same Code section, but not fresh water.
What the State taxes
Georgia taxes severed oil and gas by the unit and not by value, and the charge is not in the tax title. Title 48, Revenue and Taxation, has nineteen chapters and none of them is a severance chapter; the tax lives at O.C.G.A. 12-4-54, inside the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act, in the conservation title. That placement is worth stating because a reader searching the obvious place will conclude Georgia has no severance tax, and this record nearly published exactly that. The state charge is three cents per barrel of oil and one cent per thousand cubic feet of gas, levied on the EXTRACTOR, meaning any person removing oil or gas from the ground. There is then a second, local layer: every county and every municipal corporation is authorised to levy its own severance tax by local ordinance or resolution, capped at nine cents per barrel and two cents per thousand cubic feet, and the Department of Revenue collects it on their behalf under the same procedures and remits it to them. So the total charge on a Georgia barrel depends on the county and can be as much as twelve cents. None of these are percentages, so the rows below carry no rate to compare against a percentage state. The tax reaches oil and gas only. It does not reach the kaolin, granite, marble and aggregate that most Georgia extraction actually is, and those are dealt with through the surface mining permit and ordinary ad valorem property taxation instead.
| What is taxed | What is charged | How it works |
|---|---|---|
| Oil, charged by the barrel and not by value | Three cents per barrel of oil removed from the ground | O.C.G.A. 12-4-54(b)(1)(A). Levied on the extractor. A flat charge per barrel with no value component, so there is no percentage to state. |
| Gas, charged by volume and not by value | One cent per thousand cubic feet of gas removed from the ground | O.C.G.A. 12-4-54(b)(1)(B). Levied on the extractor. A flat charge per unit of volume, so there is no percentage to state. |
| Local option on oil, added by a county or municipality | Up to a further nine cents per barrel, if the county or municipality has passed an ordinance or resolution | O.C.G.A. 12-4-54(c)(1)(A). Not automatic. It applies only where the local governing authority has actually levied it, and the Department of Revenue collects and remits it. |
| Local option on gas, added by a county or municipality | Up to a further two cents per thousand cubic feet, if the county or municipality has passed an ordinance or resolution | O.C.G.A. 12-4-54(c)(1)(B). Not automatic, and it means the total Georgia charge on gas varies by jurisdiction between one and three cents. |
Three cents a barrel and a penny per thousand cubic feet, charged by the unit, with a local option on top
verifiedGeorgia's severance tax is easy to miss and easy to get wrong in both directions. It is not in Title 48, Revenue and Taxation, whose nineteen chapter names contain no severance chapter at all; it is at O.C.G.A. 12-4-54, inside the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act. The state charge is three cents per barrel of oil and one cent per thousand cubic feet of gas, levied on the EXTRACTOR, defined in the same section as any person removing oil or gas from the ground under that part. Because it is charged by the unit and not on value, there is no percentage rate for Georgia, and a reader comparing states should not read a blank or a zero as no tax. Above the state charge sits a local layer that is genuinely optional: each county and each municipal corporation is authorised to provide by local ordinance or resolution for a severance tax of its own, up to nine cents per barrel and two cents per thousand cubic feet. Where a local authority has levied it, the Department of Revenue collects it in the same manner and under the same procedures as the state tax and remits it to that county or municipality. So the answer to what Georgia charges depends on where the well is, and ranges from three to twelve cents a barrel.
A severance tax shall be levied on oil or gas removed from the ground in this state by an extractor as follows: (A) Three cents per barrel of oil; and (B) One cent per thousand cubic feet of gas.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror, the whole of O.C.G.A. 12-4-54. This rule is on the record because an enumeration nearly buried it. All nineteen chapter names of Title 48 were enumerated first and none of them mentions severance, and on that basis this record was about to publish a negative saying Georgia has no severance tax. The tax was in a different title altogether, inside the regulatory statute, which is the same failure Connecticut set for this record when its word mineral appeared in none of 1,114 chapter names and ninety times inside one of them. The word MINERAL does not appear anywhere in 12-4-54, which is why the tax reaches oil and gas only.
The valuation page is where every state's rate on this record sits side by side, and the page on mineral rights taxes is about what you owe on royalty income rather than about state rates.
What a driller has to do before touching the ground
A drilling permit costs 500 dollars and the applicant must personally notify every owner within half a mile of the wellhead and of any directional borehole
verifiedBefore any well other than a fresh water well may be drilled in Georgia the operator must apply to the director of the Environmental Protection Division for a drilling permit and pay a fee of 500 dollars. What follows is a notice regime more specific than most states put in a statute rather than a rule. Within thirty days of receiving a properly completed application the director must issue public notice by posting it to the division website and mailing or emailing it to anybody who has asked to be told about permit applications, and must then allow a thirty day public comment period and actually review and consider the comments received. Separately, and this is the part that reaches landowners, the APPLICANT must deliver that public notice directly within ten days, and the statute sets a floor of three things it must do: post the notice along the road nearest the proposed well; give it to every person owning real property within half a mile of the proposed wellhead AND within half a mile along the route of any directional borehole, and to any residence with a drinking water well inside the same two half mile envelopes; and publish it in at least one legal organ in the county. The directional borehole limb matters, because it means the notice envelope follows the wellbore sideways under land the operator has no surface presence on at all.
Providing the public notice to all persons owning real property within one-half mile of the proposed wellhead and within one-half mile along the route of any directional borehole and any residence that has any drinking water wells within one-half mile of the proposed wellhead and within one-half mile along the route of any directional borehole;
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror, the whole of O.C.G.A. 12-4-46. The 500 dollar figure and the thirty day periods are on the face of subsections (a) and (b), and the three notice obligations are the numbered paragraphs of subsection (c), which the statute introduces with the words at a minimum.
Kaolin, granite and aggregate go through the Surface Mining Act, not the drilling permit
verifiedO.C.G.A. § 12-4-75read from FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-75, current as of March 28, 2024
Georgia runs two entirely separate regimes inside the same chapter, and which one applies decides what a landowner can expect. Oil and gas go through the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act at O.C.G.A. 12-4-40 and following. Everything else that is dug rather than drilled goes through the Georgia Surface Mining Act at 12-4-70 and following, which is the regime that actually governs the kaolin belt, the granite and marble quarries and the aggregate pits that are the bulk of Georgia extraction. Under 12-4-75 an operator of a surface mining firm is required to obtain a permit from the division before mining, to submit and obtain approval of a mining land use plan, and to post a bond conditioned on compliance, with reclamation obligations attaching to the affected land as defined in 12-4-72. The Environmental Protection Division publishes the list of permitted surface mining facilities, so who holds a Georgia mining permit is a matter of public record and was revised as recently as April 2026. This split is also why the severance tax at 12-4-54 looks so narrow: it is written into the oil and gas part and reaches oil and gas only, leaving the minerals Georgia is actually known for outside it.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror. The whole of the Surface Mining Act part was pulled, 12-4-70 through 12-4-84, and 12-4-75 is the section imposing the operator's duties. The regulator side was confirmed the same day against the Environmental Protection Division's own page on a georgia.gov host, which states in its own words that the Surface Mining Unit reviews applications and approves surface mining land use plans, issues surface mining permits, conducts compliance evaluations, reviews and approves bonding requirements and ensures reclamation of completed mining operations.
When neighbours are forced into one drilling unit
Owners who will not agree can be compelled to integrate, and if the board cannot compel them their allowable production is capped by acreage
verifiedGeorgia has forced pooling, and it also has an unusual answer to what happens when forced pooling is unavailable. Under O.C.G.A. 12-4-45 the Board of Natural Resources may, after investigation and a hearing, establish drilling units and allocate to each unit its just and equitable share of production. Where two or more separately owned tracts fall inside an established drilling unit the owners MAY agree to integrate their interests and develop the tracts as one unit. Where they have not agreed, the board may, after notice and hearing, REQUIRE them to do so, for the prevention of waste or to avoid drilling unnecessary wells. Then comes the fallback that is worth reading twice. If the owners fail to agree and it is established that the board is without authority to require integration, each owner may drill on his or her own tract, but the allowable production from that tract is limited to the proportion of the full unit allowable that the separately owned tract bears in area to the whole drilling unit. So a holdout is not rewarded with a full well: the acreage ratio follows the minerals whether the integration is voluntary, compelled, or impossible. The same section separately empowers the board to order unit operation of a whole field or pool for enhanced recovery, but only on findings that it is reasonably necessary to prevent waste or increase ultimate recovery AND that the additional cost will not exceed the value of the additional recovery.
Should the owners of separate tracts embraced within a drilling unit fail to agree upon the integration of the tracts and the drilling of a well on the unit, and should it be established that the board is without authority to require integration as provided for above, then subject to all other applicable provisions of this part, the owner of each tract embraced within the drilling unit may drill on his or her tract, but the allowable production from said tract shall be such proportion of the allowable production for the full drilling unit as the area of such separately owned tracts bears to the full drilling unit.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror, the whole of O.C.G.A. 12-4-45 at 14,423 characters. That length is itself a note worth keeping: an earlier extraction of this same section returned 3,745 characters without failing, having been cut off mid rule by a faulty terminator, and the error was caught only by pulling the section a second way and comparing the two lengths. The text quoted here is from the corrected pull and matches the browser rendered page.
Where ownership is recorded
A prior unrecorded deed loses to a later recorded deed taken without notice, and instruments bind third parties only from filing
verifiedGeorgia deeds are recorded with the clerk of the superior court of the county where the land is located, and a deed may be recorded at any time. What a delay costs is priority. Under O.C.G.A. 44-2-1 a prior unrecorded deed loses its priority over a subsequent recorded deed from the same vendor when the later purchaser takes without notice of the earlier deed, which is the race notice rule: the later buyer needs both the recording and the absence of notice, so a buyer who knew about the earlier deed gains nothing by winning the race to the courthouse. O.C.G.A. 44-2-2(b) states the same idea from the other end for deeds, mortgages and liens of all kinds that the law requires to be recorded, providing that as against third parties who have acquired a transfer or lien on the same property in good faith and without notice, they take effect ONLY from the time they are filed for record. Filing, not execution and not delivery, is the moment that counts against a stranger to the deed. A separate rule at 44-2-3 handles gifts: an unrecorded VOLUNTARY deed or conveyance is void against a subsequent bona fide purchaser for value without notice, and recording it restores its priority.
Every deed conveying lands shall be recorded in the office of the clerk of the superior court of the county where the land is located. A deed may be recorded at any time; but a prior unrecorded deed loses its priority over a subsequent recorded deed from the same vendor when the purchaser takes such deed without notice of the existence of the prior deed.
Checked August 4, 2026. Read on 2026-08-04 from the verbatim mirror: 44-2-1 in full, 44-2-2 in full including the priority provision at subsection (b), and 44-2-3 in full. The clerk of the superior court is also required by 44-2-2 to offer electronic filing for all of the instruments listed, and to maintain a public computer terminal, so the county office is the point of search as well as the point of filing.
The page on finding who owns the minerals sets out how a search runs and where the offices differ from state to state.
The regulator
The regulator is the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Land Protection Branch, EPD. Georgia has no oil and gas commission and no mines bureau. Both regimes run through the environmental agency inside one chapter of the conservation title, with drilling under the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act and everything dug rather than drilled under the Surface Mining Act. It holds the following:
- The surface mining permit itself, together with approval of surface mining land use plans, which is the document that decides what a Georgia mining operation is allowed to do
- Compliance evaluations of surface mining operations, and the bonding requirements that back reclamation
- A published list of Permitted Surface Mining Facilities, revised April 2026, which is the public register of who actually holds a Georgia surface mining permit
- Surface mining forms and technical guidance, which is where the operative detail sits rather than in the statute
- The drilling permit function under the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act, exercised by the director of the division, including the public notice and thirty day comment period required by O.C.G.A. 12-4-46
Checked August 4, 2026. Read from the division's own page on a georgia.gov host. The third entry is the one a landowner can use today: the division publishes a list of permitted surface mining facilities, revised April 2026, so whether a given operator actually holds a Georgia permit is a public record rather than a phone call. What the division does not hold is the ownership record. That is the clerk of the superior court in the county where the land lies, which is also where the petition under 44-5-168 would be filed.
What this page does not answer yet
Every page here says what it does not answer yet. A reference that never names its own gaps is one you cannot check.
- What Georgia's 2026 amendment to O.C.G.A. 44-5-168 actually changed. The official portal shows the section in two versions, effective until and effective 1 July 2026, and the amended text could not be read because that portal now gates documents behind a CAPTCHA. Both dormancy rules on this page are marked partial for that reason and state the position as at March 2024.
- Whether Georgia's Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act gives mineral proceeds an abandonment period of their own. Six sections of the article were read, 44-12-190 and 44-12-192 through 44-12-195, and the word mineral appears in none of them, but that is six sections out of an article that runs well beyond them and is not enough to support a negative.
- Georgia case law on 44-5-168. No decision was read, so how courts have applied neither worked nor attempted to work, and what counts as an attempt, is unaddressed here.
- Whether any Georgia county or municipality has actually levied the local severance tax permitted by 12-4-54(c), and at what rate. The statute authorises it; which jurisdictions have exercised it was not established.
- Ad valorem taxation of severed mineral interests in Georgia, which is the charge most Georgia mineral owners will actually meet given that the severance tax reaches only oil and gas.
- The rest of Title 12 Chapter 4. Article 1 general provisions, Article 3 phosphates and gold, Article 4 cave protection and the Oil Well Reward part were enumerated but not read, and 12-4-22 was missed by the enumeration entirely, so nothing on this page should be read as a statement about the whole chapter.
- Surface damage compensation. No Georgia surface damage act was found, but that absence rests on reading the two mining parts of Title 12 Chapter 4 rather than on an enumeration with controls across the code, so it is not stated as a negative here.
Questions people actually ask
Does Georgia have a dormant mineral act?
No. Georgia has something that reaches a similar result by a different mechanism, and the difference changes what a mineral owner has to do about it. A dormant mineral act, of the kind South Dakota, North Dakota, Indiana and Michigan have, operates on the interest itself: the period runs, and the interest vests in the surface owner by operation of law, with no court and often no notice. Georgia's O.C.G.A. 44-5-168 is written as adverse possession. The surface owner does not receive anything automatically; the surface owner acquires the right to ask a court for a declaration, and must file a petition, plead the conveyance and the seven years, name the grantor and the last known addresses of the heirs or assigns, and serve as in an in rem proceeding including by publication. Anybody with an interest may intervene, and only a finding in the plaintiff's favour produces a decree. The practical consequences run in both directions. Georgia's period is seven years, which is the shortest on this record and less than a third of South Dakota's twenty-three, so the exposure arrives far sooner. But nothing happens in silence: a Georgia mineral owner cannot lose the interest without a lawsuit being filed and served, whereas a South Dakota owner can lose one without anyone ever writing to them. Georgia also has no marketable record title act reaching minerals that was found here. One structural warning for anybody searching: the word "mineral" appears in none of the sixteen chapter names of Title 44, Property, and 44-5-168 sits inside Chapter 5, Acquisition and Loss of Property, in the prescription article. A chapter list would miss it entirely.
What stops the seven year clock in Georgia?
Three things defeat a claim, and two more situations remove the statute altogether. The condition in subsection (a) is that the mineral owner "have neither worked nor attempted to work the mineral rights nor paid any taxes due on them". That is conjunctive, so the surface owner has to establish all three absences and the mineral owner only has to have done one thing. Paying the ad valorem taxes is the cheapest of the three and requires nothing on the ground. An attempt to work the minerals also counts even if it produced nothing, which is unusual drafting: most statutes on this record that recognise activity require actual production, a recorded instrument or a lease, and Georgia expressly accepts an attempt. Then subsection (f) does something different in kind. Rather than giving the mineral owner a defence inside the statute, it puts two situations outside it: "Nothing in this Code section shall apply to a lease for a specific number of years nor to an owner of mineral rights who has leased the mineral rights in writing to a licensed mining operator as defined in Part 3 of Article 2 of Chapter 4 of Title 12." Part 3 of Article 2 of Chapter 4 of Title 12 is the Georgia Surface Mining Act, so "licensed mining operator" points at the permitting regime run by the Environmental Protection Division, and the division publishes the list of permitted surface mining facilities. A written lease to an operator on that list therefore appears to take the mineral owner outside 44-5-168 whether or not anybody ever mines and whether or not the taxes are paid. This is the part of the section most exposed to the 2026 amendment that this page cannot read, because carve-outs are exactly what amendments narrow, so check the current text before relying on it.
Does Georgia have a severance tax on minerals?
Yes, on oil and gas, and it is in the last place a reader would look. Georgia's severance tax is not in Title 48, Revenue and Taxation. That title has nineteen chapters and not one of them is a severance chapter, which is why this record came close to publishing a negative saying Georgia has no severance tax at all. The tax is at O.C.G.A. 12-4-54, in Title 12, Conservation and Natural Resources, inside the Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act, sitting among the drilling permits and the pooling powers rather than among the taxes. It is charged by the unit and not on value: three cents per barrel of oil and one cent per thousand cubic feet of gas, levied on the "extractor", which the same section defines as any person removing oil or gas from the ground under that part. There is no percentage, so a national comparison that shows a rate column has nothing to put in Georgia's row, and a blank there should not be read as no tax. Above the state charge sits a genuinely optional second layer. Each county and each municipal corporation "is authorized to provide by local ordinance or resolution for the levy, assessment, and collection of a severance tax", capped at nine cents per barrel and two cents per thousand cubic feet, and where a local authority has levied it the Department of Revenue collects it under the same procedures as the state tax and remits it to that county or municipality. So the total on a Georgia barrel is somewhere between three and twelve cents depending on where the well is, and this page does not tell you which jurisdictions have actually passed the ordinance, because that was not established. The word "mineral" does not appear anywhere in 12-4-54. The tax reaches oil and gas only, which leaves the kaolin, granite, marble and aggregate that Georgia is actually known for outside it entirely.
What counts as a mineral in Georgia?
Anything naturally occurring in the earth that has commercial value. O.C.G.A. 12-4-42 defines "mineral" as "any naturally occurring substance found in the earth which has commercial value", expressly including oil and gas as separately defined in the same section, and expressly excluding fresh water. Commercial value is the whole test, which makes the category move with the market rather than with a list: a substance nobody wanted last decade is inside the definition the moment it is worth taking, without any amendment. Compare the other shapes on this record. Hawaii lists substances and then carves out the sand, rock and gravel used in general construction. Maryland's dormant mineral act lists eight categories including cement materials, road materials and building stone. Idaho's state lands reservation runs a long list and then adds "all other minerals of whatsoever kind". Maine gets to a narrow answer functionally, by asking whether the economically valuable constituent is a metal. Georgia is the widest of the five and gets there in one clause. The companion definition matters just as much for anybody trying to work out who the regulator will deal with: "owner" means "the person who has the right to drill into and produce from any pool and to appropriate the production either for himself or herself and another, or himself or herself and others". That is a functional test too, identical in shape to New Mexico's, and its effect is that for regulatory purposes the person who counts is whoever holds the drilling right at that moment, which will often be a lessee rather than the fee mineral owner. Note the gap this opens: the wide definition of mineral governs the regulatory chapter, while the severance tax in the same chapter reaches only oil and gas, so the two are not co-extensive.
Who has to be told before a well is drilled in Georgia?
Everybody within half a mile, and the envelope follows the borehole sideways. Before any well other than a fresh water well may be drilled the operator applies to the director of the Environmental Protection Division and pays a 500 dollar permit fee. The director then has thirty days from a properly completed application to issue public notice by posting it to the division website and mailing or emailing it to anybody who has asked to be told about permit applications, must allow a thirty day comment period running from the date of the website posting, and must "review and consider the public comments received". The obligation that reaches landowners falls on the applicant, not the agency, and the statute sets a floor of three things it must do within ten days. Post the notice along the road nearest the proposed well. Publish it in at least one legal organ in the county. And provide it "to all persons owning real property within one-half mile of the proposed wellhead and within one-half mile along the route of any directional borehole and any residence that has any drinking water wells within one-half mile of the proposed wellhead and within one-half mile along the route of any directional borehole". The directional borehole limb is the one worth dwelling on. A modern well can travel a long way laterally, and this notice envelope travels with it, so an owner who has no surface works anywhere near them, and who would learn nothing from looking out of the window, is still entitled to be told in person. The drinking water well limb is a second, separate trigger that catches residences rather than owners. Georgia puts all of this in the statute; most states on this record that have anything comparable put it in a rule, where it is easier to change and harder to find.
Can Georgia force my minerals into somebody else’s drilling unit?
Yes, and Georgia has also legislated for what happens when it cannot. Under O.C.G.A. 12-4-45 the Board of Natural Resources may, after due investigation and a hearing, establish drilling units, control the allocation of production over them, and allocate to each unit its "just and equitable share". Where two or more separately owned tracts fall inside an established drilling unit, the owners may agree to integrate their interests and develop the tracts as one unit. Where they have not agreed, the board may, after notice and hearing, require them to do so, for the prevention of waste or to avoid drilling unnecessary wells. That is ordinary forced pooling. The unusual part is the fallback. If the owners fail to agree and "it is established that the board is without authority to require integration", then each owner may drill on their own tract, but "the allowable production from said tract shall be such proportion of the allowable production for the full drilling unit as the area of such separately owned tracts bears to the full drilling unit". In other words the acreage ratio governs the outcome whether integration is voluntary, compelled, or legally impossible. A holdout who cannot be pooled does not get a full well; they get their acreage share of the unit allowable, which removes most of the reason to hold out. Separately, the board may order unit operation of an entire field or pool for enhanced recovery, but only on two findings: that unit operation is reasonably necessary to prevent waste as defined in 12-4-42 or to increase ultimate recovery, and that the estimated additional cost will not exceed the value of the estimated additional recovery. That second finding is a real constraint, and it is drafted as a condition of the order rather than as guidance.
How does recording work in Georgia?
Deeds go to the clerk of the superior court in the county where the land is located, and Georgia asks two questions rather than one. Section 44-2-1 provides that every deed conveying lands shall be recorded there, that "a deed may be recorded at any time", and then states the cost of waiting: "a prior unrecorded deed loses its priority over a subsequent recorded deed from the same vendor when the purchaser takes such deed without notice of the existence of the prior deed." That is the race notice shape, the same as Colorado, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and the others grouped on this record: the later buyer needs both to record and to have taken without notice, so a buyer who knew about the earlier deed gains nothing by winning the race to the courthouse. Section 44-2-2 states the same rule from the other end and widens it past deeds. The clerk must file, index and permanently record deeds, mortgages, liens of all kinds, maps or plats, and state tax executions; and as against third parties who have acquired a transfer or lien on the same property "in good faith and without notice", those instruments "shall take effect only from the time they are filed for record in the clerk's office". Filing is the operative moment against a stranger to the deed, not execution and not delivery. A third rule at 44-2-3 handles gifts separately: an unrecorded voluntary deed or conveyance is void against a subsequent bona fide purchaser for value without notice, and recording it restores priority. Two practical notes. The clerk is required to offer electronic filing for everything in that list and to maintain a public computer terminal, so the county office is the point of search as well as the point of filing. And the superior court clerk's office is also where a 44-5-168 petition is filed, which means the office holding the record of your interest is the office where a claim against it would begin.
Why was Georgia missing from this record until August 2026?
Because of how Georgia publishes its statutes, and then twice because of mistakes made here about that. Georgia routes the Official Code of Georgia Annotated through a LexisNexis public access portal, run for the Georgia Code Revision Commission under contract. The portal is real, it is free, and the whole fifty-three title code renders in a browser. What it has never had is an address: opening a section does not change the URL, every URL in it is built from session tokens and a timestamp, and there is nothing a reader could be given that would take them back to the section later. As of August 2026 it also gates documents behind a CAPTCHA, which this record will not bypass. This site cites only sources a reader can open and check, so that portal cannot be the citation. The two mistakes were ours. The first ruling, on 3 August 2026, blamed a JavaScript shell at a host that does not resolve, which was a typo standing in for evidence. The second, on 4 August, correctly identified the portal and then concluded the state was unreachable without a change to the sourcing rule. It was not. codes.findlaw.com has been on this site's verbatim-mirror allowlist since before Georgia was ever probed, it carries the full Georgia Code at stable per-section addresses, and the mirror tier is defined in this repository's own words as being for exactly this case, "used when the official text exists but will not extract". New Mexico already runs on that arrangement for the same reason. The cost of the delay is visible on this page and has not been hidden: the mirror states it is current to 28 March 2024, and Georgia's portal shows 44-5-168 in a version effective 1 July 2026 that could not be read, so both dormancy rules here are marked partial and say so.
Sources read
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 44-5-168, adverse possession of mineral rights O.C.G.A. s. 44-5-168 read August 4, 2026, in full through subsection (f); mirror states current as of March 28, 2024
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-54, severance tax O.C.G.A. s. 12-4-54 read August 4, 2026; the tax is in the conservation title, not Title 48
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-42, definitions O.C.G.A. s. 12-4-42(8) and (11) read August 4, 2026, 10 occurrences of mineral counted inside the section
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-45, drilling units and integration O.C.G.A. s. 12-4-45 read August 4, 2026, 14,423 characters, verified against a second extraction
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-46, drilling permit and notice O.C.G.A. s. 12-4-46 read August 4, 2026
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 12-4-75, surface mining operator duties O.C.G.A. s. 12-4-75 read August 4, 2026, with 12-4-70 to 12-4-84 pulled as a part
- FindLaw Codes, Georgia Code 44-2-1, priority of recorded deeds O.C.G.A. ss. 44-2-1, 44-2-2 and 44-2-3 read August 4, 2026, all three sections in full
- Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Surface Mining read August 4, 2026; permitted facilities list revised April 2026